sentry-code-review
Analyze and resolve Sentry comments on GitHub Pull Requests. Use this when asked to review or fix issues identified by Sentry in PR comments. Can review specific PRs by number or automatically find recent PRs with Sentry feedback.
design-doc-reviewer
Use when reviewing design documents, technical specifications, or architecture docs before implementation planning
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
code-reviewer
Comprehensive multi-AI code review system for Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript. Use when reviewing code for quality, security, performance, or best practices. Includes automated analysis scripts, language-specific patterns, and AI collaboration workflows for complex decisions.
review-implementing
Process and implement code review feedback systematically. Use when user provides reviewer comments, PR feedback, code review notes, or asks to implement suggestions from reviews.
ui-ux-a11y-static-review
This skill should be used when performing static UI/UX and accessibility reviews of frontend codebases and producing a three-step report (context mapping, violations, executive synthesis) from code only.
Documentation review
Reviews documentation for factual accuracy
skill-review
|
peer-review
Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.
code-review-excellence
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
command-audit
Audits command files for correctness and best practices. Use when reviewing, improving, or validating commands, checking frontmatter, assessing structure, or learning command quality standards.
output-style-audit
Validates output-style persona definitions, behavior specifications, and keep-coding-instructions decisions. Use when auditing, reviewing, or improving output-styles, checking persona clarity, validating behavior concreteness, or verifying scope alignment (user vs project). Triggers when user asks about output-style best practices or needs help with persona definition.
skill-audit
Audits skills for discoverability and triggering effectiveness. Use when reviewing skill descriptions, checking trigger coverage, validating progressive disclosure, fixing invocation issues, or learning skill best practices.
reviewing-code
Get code review from Codex AI for implementation quality, bug detection, and best practices. Use when asked to review code, check for bugs, find security issues, or get feedback on implementation patterns.
code-reviewer
コードレビューとベストプラクティスの提案を行うスキル
resolve-pr-comments
Resolve bot review comments (CodeRabbit, Copilot, Gemini) on GitHub PRs using subagents. Use when: (1) User asks to 'review PR comments' or 'resolve PR comments', (2) User says 'work through PR N comments' or 'handle bot comments', (3) Need to triage CodeRabbit/Copilot/Gemini review comments, (4) Processing PR feedback at scale, (5) Want to see what's already fixed vs still pending. NOT for: creating PRs, reviewing code yourself, writing new reviews. Triggers: review PR comments, resolve PR comments, work through PR comments, handle bot comments, process CodeRabbit comments, triage PR feedback, fix PR review issues, resolve bot comments, pr comment resolver.
code-review
Review code changes using CodeRabbit CLI - supports uncommitted files (task mode) or all PR files vs main branch (pr mode). Catches bugs, security issues, and code quality problems before committing or when reviewing pull requests. Use when: (1) Reviewing uncommitted changes before committing (task mode), (2) Reviewing all changed files in a PR against main branch (pr mode), (3) Working on subtasks and want to check progress, (4) Need feedback on work-in-progress code, (5) Preparing PR for merge, (6) When CodeRabbit review is needed, (7) For bug detection and security scanning, or (8) For automated code quality assessment. Triggers: review code, check code quality, review changes, code review, review PR, check for bugs, security scan, review uncommitted, finalize code, pre-commit review.
magic-model-review
Evaluates Magic Model (Triangle) frameworks for BlackBelt coaches using Ed Dale's frameworks. Produces Facebook-ready feedback comments.
Page 2 of 12 · 201 results