offer-diamond-review
Evaluates Offer Diamonds for BlackBelt coaches using Ed Dale's frameworks. Produces Facebook-ready feedback comments.
doc-review
ドキュメントレビューを実施するためのスキル。提案書、設計書、PRD、技術仕様書などのドキュメントをレビューする際に使用します。「ドキュメントをレビュー」「提案書をチェック」「設計書を確認」「この文書をレビューして」「ドキュメントの品質を確認」などのドキュメントレビュータスクに言及した場合にトリガーします。ビジネス・戦略観点、論理構造、技術的妥当性、リスク管理、表現の正確性を多角的に評価し、建設的な改善提案を行います。
marp-slide-reviewer
ローカルサーバーで起動している Marp スライドを視覚的に検証し、レイアウト問題を自動修正するスキル。「スライドをレビュー」「Marp スライドの視覚的チェック」「スライドのレイアウトを確認」「プレゼン資料の見た目を検証」などのリクエストでトリガーします。テキストの切れ目、重なり、配置問題、コントラスト不足、はみ出し、余白不足などの視覚的問題を検出・修正します。
code-review
コードレビューを実施するためのスキル。ユーザーがコードの品質、セキュリティ、テスト、パフォーマンス、アーキテクチャの観点からコードレビューを依頼した場合に使用します。「コードレビュー」「コードをチェック」「PRをレビュー」「このコードを確認して」などのコードレビュータスクに言及した場合にトリガーします。セキュリティ脆弱性、ロジックエラー、テスト品質、パフォーマンス問題を優先順位付けして指摘し、具体的な改善提案を行います。
proposal-reviewer
Acts as a Contextual Analyst. Reviews pending proposals by checking the codebase to establish *plausibility* and *value*. Approves proposals where the code context supports the suggested improvements.
review-code
Review code against spec compliance - checks implementation matches spec requirements, identifies deviations, reports compliance score, triggers evolution if needed
review-spec
Review specifications for soundness, completeness, and implementability - validates structure, identifies ambiguities, checks for gaps before implementation
reviewing-implementation-progress
Reviews in-progress implementation against feature specification and plan - provides structured compliance report with categorized issues for fixing. Mid-implementation checkpoint for quality.
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements - dispatches code-review subagent to review implementation against plan or requirements before proceeding
code-review
Comprehensive code review framework for evaluating implementations against plans, requirements, and quality standards. Provides structured analysis with prioritized, actionable feedback.
code-review
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.
domain-review-before-implementation
BEFORE dispatching any implementation agent or starting to code - if you're about to write "Task(subagent_type=..., prompt=...)" for implementation, or about to implement a plan yourself, STOP and review first. The prompt you're about to send IS a brief - review it for design flaws before the agent implements garbage.
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements - dispatches superpowers:code-reviewer subagent to review implementation against plan or requirements before proceeding
code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims. | Sử dụng khi review code, đánh giá code, xem xét PR, pull request, cải thiện chất lượng code.
code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
reviewer
代码审查员,守护质量闸口。对所有部门(Backend/Frontend/SCF/Deploy)的 PR 进行安全、性能、正确性、可维护性、可观测性的系统性审查。遵循证据先行、问题分级、签发修复卡、独立克制的工程基线。适用于收到任一部门提交 PR 或需要质量把关时使用。
Page 3 of 12 · 201 results