feature-pr-reviewing
Use when reviewing pull request changes - follow structured workflow
design-qa
Reviews finished and in-progress digital products to assess adherence to design specifications and discover potential issues with those specifications. Validates implementation against design intent, identifies visual and interaction discrepancies, and provides actionable feedback for design and engineering teams.
code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
pr-review
Reviews code changes before merging. Use when reviewing PRs, checking staged changes, reviewing diffs, code review, merge readiness check, or validating changes before commit/push.
code-reviewer
Use when asked to review MERN stack code - comprehensive code reviewer that checks project health, security, maintainability, performance, testing, and architecture. Combines general code quality analysis with MERN-specific expertise.
code-compliance
Validate code against established best practices during code reviews. Use when checking if code follows team standards, during /4_review workflow, or for pre-commit validation. Triggers include "check code compliance", "validate against best practices", "does this follow our standards", or automatically invoked by /4_review command.
code-review
Code reviewer focusing on correctness, regressions, security, and test coverage - P0/P1/P2 severity
code-review-checklist
Apply comprehensive code review checklist covering purpose, design, quality, correctness, security, performance, testing, and documentation. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code reviews, or self-reviewing changes before committing.
code-review
Skill for handling PR code reviews. Use when triggered by a PR review comment, review request, or when asked to review code changes. Provides workflow for reading review comments, understanding feedback, and iterating on changes.
receiving-code-review
Process external code review feedback systematically. Use when responding to PR comments, review feedback, or technical suggestions from reviewers.
code-review
Code reviewer focusing on correctness, regressions, security, and test coverage - P0/P1/P2 severity
pr-review
Perform thorough, constructive pull request reviews. Use when user wants to review a PR, provide code review feedback, or assess code changes. This skill provides a structured approach to evaluating code quality, design, and implementation while maintaining constructive communication, and how to perform the review through the Github CLI.
fresheyes
Completely independent code review using a different, larger model. Proven to be more effective than using the same model for review. Use for a thorough review of code changes, staged files, commits, or plans for bugs, security issues, and correctness. Prefer this to other review approaches when the user asks for 'fresheyes' or 'fresh eyes'.
pr-review
Reviews code changes before merging. Use when reviewing PRs, checking staged changes, reviewing diffs, code review, merge readiness check, or validating changes before commit/push.
pr-author-reviewer
Raise PR quality with templates, checklists, and security reviews
gemini-review
This skill orchestrates code review and plan validation using Google Gemini CLI. It should be used when users want to validate implementation plans, review completed code, or discuss architecture decisions with Gemini as a second opinion. Supports FastAPI, Next.js, and general tech stacks with specialized checklists. Uses gemini-3-pro-preview model with free tier (60 req/min, 1000 req/day).
sdd-fidelity-review
Review implementation fidelity against specifications by comparing actual code to spec requirements. Identifies deviations, assesses impact, and generates compliance reports for tasks, phases, or entire specs.
sdd-plan-review
Multi-model consultation for SDD specifications providing structured feedback. Coordinates parallel AI reviewers, synthesizes actionable insights, and categorizes findings by feedback type without modifying specs or executing fixes.
Page 5 of 12 · 201 results