receiving-code-review
Assesses and responds to incoming code review feedback on PRs (reviewer comments, requested changes), especially when suggestions are unclear, technically questionable, or scope-expanding. Use before implementing review suggestions to align on intent and keep changes minimal.
requesting-code-review
Use when you need to request a code review for a PR/MR and want a consistent review brief (context, scope, risk areas, test instructions, acceptance criteria) before merge.
critical-biblical-listener
Evaluate sermon content from a biblically literate perspective. Assess theological accuracy, scriptural alignment, and exegetical integrity. Identify where claims may overextend biblical support, misapply context, or import assumptions not evident in the text. Use when reviewing sermons, Bible teachings, or theological content for biblical faithfulness.
code-review
Reviews code for best practices, bugs, security issues, and provides improvement suggestions
code-review
Review code for quality, security vulnerabilities, and best practices compliance
code-review
Activates when user wants code reviewed for quality, best practices, bugs, or improvements. Triggers on "review this code", "check my implementation", "is this code good", "find bugs", "improve this function", "code quality check", or requests for feedback on code.
code-review-facilitator
Automated code review for Arduino/ESP32/RP2040 projects focusing on best practices, memory safety, and common pitfalls. Use when user wants code feedback, says "review my code", needs help improving code quality, or before finalizing a project. Generates actionable checklists and specific improvement suggestions.
code-review
効果的なコードレビューの実施方法、レビュー観点チェックリスト、建設的なフィードバック技術、セルフレビュー手法、自動化ツール活用まで、品質とチームコラボレーションを向上させる包括的ガイド。
review-diffs
Performs comprehensive code review on git diffs and generates review.md with quality scores, critical issues, performance concerns, and potential bugs. Use when user requests to review changes, check code quality, analyze diffs, or validate LLM-generated code
review-format
Output in the specified format when a review of specific markdown is requested.
simple-review-format
Output in the specified format when a review of specific markdown is requested.
code-reviewer
|
codereview
Deep code review skill for Go code focusing on performance, security, concurrency safety, and readability. Supports reviewing local uncommitted code, recent commits, or specified commits/branches/tags.
code-review
Perform thorough code reviews with security, performance, and maintainability analysis. Use when user asks to review code, check for bugs, or audit a codebase.
code-quality
Code quality standards for reviewing code changes. Automatically provides quality checklist when reviewing PRs, implementing features, or discussing code quality.
receiving-code-review
>-
reviewing-code
>-
technical-review
Validate completed implementation against plan tasks and acceptance criteria. Sixth phase of research-discussion-specification-plan-implement-review workflow. Use when: (1) Implementation phase is complete, (2) User wants validation before merging/shipping, (3) Quality gate check needed after implementation. Reviews ALL plan tasks for implementation correctness, test adequacy, and code quality. Produces structured feedback (approve, request changes, or comments) - does NOT fix code.
Page 4 of 12 · 201 results